How do Ethernet frames differ between Ethernet II and IEEE 802.3 formats?

How do Ethernet frames differ between Ethernet II and IEEE 802.3 formats?

• A. Ethernet II uses a Length field for encapsulation, while IEEE 802.3 uses EtherType.
• B. Ethernet II uses an EtherType field, while IEEE 802.3 uses a Length field.
• C. Both formats use the same framing method.
• D. Neither format supports encapsulation.

Answer: (B)

Ethernet frames differ between Ethernet II and IEEE 802.3 formats primarily due to the way they handle protocol information in the frame header. Ethernet II uses an EtherType field, occupying two bytes, to indicate which protocol is encapsulated within the frame, such as IPv4 or ARP. This allows for a more straightforward interpretation of the encapsulated data by the receiving system, as it can easily identify the appropriate protocol and process the data accordingly. On the other hand, IEEE 802.3 uses a Length field instead of an EtherType field. This Length field specifies the number of bytes in the payload of the frame, which can lead to confusion in interpreting the content when network protocols need to be accounted for. The presence of a Length field introduces a limitation since it constrains the frame to handle protocols in a more rigid manner compared to Ethernet II. Overall, the use of EtherType in Ethernet II allows better flexibility and efficiency in protocol identification, making it essential for modern networking environments where multiple protocols are frequently used. This highlights the key difference between the two formats, clarifying why the choice regarding the specifics of the EtherType and Length field is crucial in understanding Ethernet frame formats.

Ethernet frames differ between Ethernet II and IEEE 802.3 formats primarily due to the way they handle protocol information in the frame header. Ethernet II uses an EtherType field, occupying two bytes, to indicate which protocol is encapsulated within the frame, such as IPv4 or ARP. This allows for a more straightforward interpretation of the encapsulated data by the receiving system, as it can easily identify the appropriate protocol and process the data accordingly.

On the other hand, IEEE 802.3 uses a Length field instead of an EtherType field. This Length field specifies the number of bytes in the payload of the frame, which can lead to confusion in interpreting the content when network protocols need to be accounted for. The presence of a Length field introduces a limitation since it constrains the frame to handle protocols in a more rigid manner compared to Ethernet II.

Overall, the use of EtherType in Ethernet II allows better flexibility and efficiency in protocol identification, making it essential for modern networking environments where multiple protocols are frequently used. This highlights the key difference between the two formats, clarifying why the choice regarding the specifics of the EtherType and Length field is crucial in understanding Ethernet frame formats.